Preventive Management of Industrial Enterprise Environmental Risks

Ekaterina L. Vodolazhskaya, Olga V. Kiseleva, Regina R. Kharisova, Sergey A. Sutyagin, Rashad A. Kurbanov, Irina V. Lushchik, Sofia Sh. Ostanina, Larisa F. Zhandarova

Ekoloji, 2019, Issue 107, Pages: 317-324, Article No: e107043

OPEN ACCESS

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The current ecological state of the environment is characterized by serious concerns on the part of civil society. Positioning of the nature-conformity and overall Greening requires a fundamental change of approaches to the implementation of industrial enterprises’ activities– responsible behavior in the field of environmental protection. The purpose of the study is to identify the environmental risks of the industrial enterprise and the development of new management mechanisms that can prevent the threat of their occurrence. The authors based on the concept of modern risk management and the current quality management standard identified possible sources of environmental risks, including those related to the knowledge of the organization. An algorithm for identification of environmental risks, based on its probabilistic assessment, qualitative and quantitative methods and taking into account the human factor and the social responsibility of business in the environment of industrial areas. The pain points of the industrial enterprise conditions’ control that determine the adoption of preventive management decisions are revealed. The article is intended for managers and employees of industrial enterprises’ environmental management systems.

Keywords

industrial enterprise, environmental risks, environmental management, environmental threats, preventive management, knowledge of the organization, social responsibility

References

  • Aksenova OV (2011) The illusion of ecological modernization. History and Modernity, 2: 103-113.
  • Aliyeva NZ, Tumanova MA, Shevchenko YuS (2012) The worldview and sociocultural dimension of the consequences of nanotechnological progress for society. Modern problems of science and education, 5: 114-126. Retrieved from http://www.science-education.ru/105 8/6
  • Behmann G (2010) Modern society: risk society, information society, knowledge society. Moscow: Logos.
  • Buletova NE (2013) Ecological and economic security: nature, content and problems of diagnostics in the regions of Russia. Volgograd: Volgograd branch RGATU.
  • Busygin AK (2015) Ensuring the sustainable development of enterprises on the basis of preventive crisis management. MID (Modernization. Innovations. Development), 21: 126-132.
  • Diev VS (2010) Risk: assessment and decision making. Philosophy of Science, 4: 15-32.
  • Dolinina IG, Kushnareva OV (2016) Risk-based thinking of students: relevance, definition and operations. Modern high technologies, 9(3): 495-499.
  • Dosmagambetova RS, Turmukhambetova AA, Terekhin SP, Kalishev MG (2014) Environmental risks and public health. Occupational medicine and industrial ecology, 3: 5-10.
  • Dudin MN, Lyasnikov NV, Yegorushkin PA, Safin FM (2013) Innovative foresight as a tool for the competitive development of business structures. Monograph. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House.
  • Kabantseva VS (2012) Transformation of views on the content of the category “environmental risk”. News Saratov University, 1: 40-44.
  • Kamdina LV (2013) Environmental activities of the enterprise as a factor in ensuring environmental safety. Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin (Economics), 8: 89-94.
  • Kirillov SN, Egorova EV (2011) Ecological and economic assessment of the prevention and elimination of consequences of emergency situations. Bulletin of Volgograd State University, 11(1): 48-54.
  • Kuzmin EA (2012) Measures of preventive management of uncertainty in organizational and economic systems. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, 4: 269-284.
  • Mozgovaya AV, Shlykova EV (2016) Inequality in risk sharing: resources and adaptation strategies. Russia undergoing reform, 14: 358-378.
  • Orlov AI, Pugach OV (2012) Approaches to the general theory of risk. Control of large systems, 40: 49-81.
  • Platonov KA (2016) Perception of environmental risks: expert assessments and public opinion. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy, 1: 99-107.
  • Reznik GA, Khazova YS (2017) Environmental protection is an important component of business social responsibility. News of Science and Education, 1: 77-84.
  • Reznik GA, Malyshev AA (2011) The management model of the sustainability of the ecological-economic system. News of the Penza State Pedagogical University, 24: 403-407.
  • Shchankina EG (2016) Ecology of urban areas. European Research, 8: 72-73.
  • Shestak MN (2015) Barriers to the implementation of environmental management systems in accordance with international standards ISO 14001. Drucker Bulletin, 3: 105–121.
  • Shtrikov AB (2010) Problems of training specialists in the implementation of environmental management systems in enterprises. Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 10: 778-781.
  • Smetanina T, Pintassilgo P, Matias A (2014) Environmental management tools: international practicies for Russia, Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Economics and Law Series, 1: 79-97.
  • Tikhomirov DA, Kistkina IA (2017) The problem of awareness of the environmental threat in Russia. Humanities Horizons, 2: 55-61.
  • Valčo M, Šturák P (2018) The “Relational Self”: Philosophical-Religious Reflections in Anthropology and Personalism. XLinguae, 11(1): 289-299.
  • Vasilenko VA (2018) A programmatic approach to solving environmental problems during the socio-economic development of Crimea. Ecological Bulletin of Russia, 3: 50-54.
  • Yanitsky O (2014) Sociology of critical conditions of society: theoretical and methodological problems. Sociological science and social practice, 4:6-14.