Research on High Performance Work Systematic Influences on Employees Work Behaviour in Environmental Company
Change Yi, Aimin Yan
Ekoloji, 2018, Issue 106, Pages: 337-349, Article No: e106025
OPEN ACCESS
Download Full Text (PDF)
Abstract
The rise of the environmental company has made knowledge workers more and more important in contemporary organizations. In the contemporary era, establishing the innovation-oriented country is vigorously advocated, which makes more people try the best to exert innovative capabilities for this goal, and therefore how to improve employee’s innovation performance in the environmental company has gained more and more attentions. Staff’s innovation performance is the source of organizational innovation, which is vital to organization’s sustainable competitive advantage. Meanwhile, the innovation performance is affected by many factors, for example, the high-performance work system can make a great influence on it. However, in the past study, the relationship between the employee work behavior and the high performance work systematic influence in the environmental company is not figured out, and the mechanism of action is also not clear. In this study, the high performance work system would be used as the antecedent variable to explore its relationship with the employee innovation performance, and the relationship between the employees’ psychological capital and the employee’s innovation performance in the environmental company from the perspective of psychological capital is explored, where the employee psychological capital is considered as intermediary variables.
Keywords
high performance work system, psychological capital, innovation performance, knowledge-based worker, environmental company
References
- Akhavan P, Jafari M, Fathian M (2006) Critical success factors of knowledge management systems: a multi-case analysis. European business review, 18(2): 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340610651820
- Cao Q, Thompson MA, Triche J (2013) Investigating the role of business processes and knowledge management systems on performance: A multi-case study approach. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18): 5565-5575. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.789145
- Chenhall RH (2003) Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, organizations and society, 28(2): 127-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
- Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic management journal: 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::AID-SMJ804>3.0.CO;2-U
- Davila A, Foster G (2007) Management control systems in early-stage startup companies. The accounting review, 82(4): 907-937. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.907
- Geraldi JG (2008) The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4): 348-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.013
- Hacklin F, Marxt C, Fahrni F (2009) Coevolutionary cycles of convergence: An extrapolation from the ICT industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6): 723-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.003
- Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence TB (2003) Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of management studies, 40(2): 321-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00342
- Kumar RL, Crook CW (1999) A multi-disciplinary framework for the management of interorganizational systems. ACM SIGMIS Database, 30(1): 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/342251.342258
- Lawrence TB, Hardy C, Phillips N (2002) Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of management journal, 45(1): 281-290.
- McCutcheon DM, Meredith JR (1993) Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11(3): 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7
- Möller K, Rajala A (2007) Rise of strategic nets—New modes of value creation. Industrial marketing management, 36(7): 895-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.016
- Möller K, Svahn S (2003) Managing strategic nets: A capability perspective. Marketing theory, 3(2): 209-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931030032002
- Möller K, Svahn S (2006) Role of knowledge in value creation in business nets. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5): 985-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00626.x
- Naini SGJ, Aliahmadi AR, Jafari-Eskandari M (2011) Designing a mixed performance measurement system for environmental supply chain management using evolutionary game theory and balanced scorecard: A case study of an auto industry supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6): 593-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.10.008
- Otero-Neira C, Tapio Lindman M, Fernández MJ (2009) Innovation and performance in SME furniture industries: An international comparative case study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(2): 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500910944995
- Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga JF, et al. (2009) A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5): 864-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
- Thomas JB, Trevino LK (1993) Information processing in strategic alliance building: A multiple‐case approach. Journal of Management Studies, 30(5): 779-814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00326.x
- Tseng SM (2010) The correlation between organizational culture and knowledge conversion on corporate performance. Journal of knowledge management, 14(2): 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011032409
- Valkokari K, Helander N (2007) Knowledge management in different types of strategic SME networks. Management Research News, 30(8): 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710773724